See also:
- Caught in the Web - - A journalist's guide to web searches. Covers when to use the library, obstacles to finding what you need on the web (including unreliable information), tips for searching, and links to content-rich sites.
|
- Choice Framework - - Developed to evaluate the quality of health-related websites aimed primarily at online health consumers. Evaluation criteria fall under the headings of Credibility, Content, Disclosure, Links, Design, Interactivity, Caveats and Differentiation.
|
- Consumer WebWatch - - Consumers WebWatch, a project of Consumers Union, publishes research and journalism on credibility issues that matter to consumers, and recommends Web-wide guidelines to address widespread problems of credibility and trust.
|
- Evaluate your Sources - - Checklist for judging reliability of information. Links to other sites about the topic.
|
- Evaluating Internet Research Sources - - Guidelines for evaluating Internet sources, including a checklist to help assure credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and supported claims.
|
- Evaluating Quality - - Questions to ask and tips for looking for authoritative information on the internet.
|
- Evaluating the Quality of Web Sites - - Short page covering some basic points: Who is responsible? Is the URL appropriate? Who do they link to? Who links to them? Use common sense.
|
- Evaluating Web Resources - - Modules for evaluating all manner of sites. Includes questions and criteria lists, plus links to example pages for discussion.
|
- Evaluating Web Sites - - Seeks to provide the necessary guidelines to use to determine the quality and accuracy of the information found on the World Wide Web. A document from the University of Maryland libraries.
|
- Evaluating Web Sites - - A brief introduction to the World Wide Web as a source of information, and evaluating sites for educational content.
|
- Evaluating Web Sites for Educational Uses - - This site contains a list of articles from librarians and other information specialists on Web evaluations. In addition, a checklist for evaluating a Web site of as a potential education resource is included.
|
- Exemplary Practices in Teaching Web Evaluation - - Presentation given in 1998. Covers why evaluation of web resources is necessary, and gives criteria for scrutinizing web materials. Provides links to many related and supporting sites.
|
- Information Quality - - Sections on gaining full access to materials which may be censored, understanding how to search, and evaluating what is found using the internet.
|
- ISI Web Site Selection Criteria - - Thomson ISI sells a product called "Current Web Contents" which includes, in part, a premium collection of evaluated scholarly Web sites. This is how sites are selected for inclusion, and how they're evaluated.
|
- Producing Quality Web Page Content - - Article explains how to give a web page content the mark of quality. Conversely, it helps point out what to look for in a quality site.
|
- Searchpath. WNEC Library Tutorial - - Tutorial to help learn how to find and critically evaluate information resources. Sponsored by Western Michigan University Libraries.
|
- Teaching Zack to Think - - Article written by Alan November for the September 1998 High School Principal Magazine.
|
- Web Awareness Canada - - Introduction to a program which provides resources about Internet Literacy for teachers, parents and librarians.
|
- The Web Credibility Project - - Part of the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, their goal is to understand what leads people to believe what they find on the Web. With information, papers, and related links.
|
- Webserch - Evaluate Web Resources - - Guide to assessing the source, the content, and the format of websites, the primary considerations being accuracy, authority, coverage, currency and objectivity. Checklists in HTML and pdf format available.
|
- WWW Cyberguides - - Created by a library media specialist, contains guides for rating the curriculum content and graphic design of web sites.
|
- Web-Based Information in the Context of Higher Education - - Scholarly paper argues that higher education students are naïve about the problem of misinformation, believe they can identify it, and do not make extra effort to check the sources of their information. Discusses sources and causes of misinformation and how it can be combatted. (1998)
|
|