 DIRECTORY SUBMISSION AS LOW AS $20. DIRECTORY SUBMISSION SERVICE
Reviews and Previews
See also:
- All Game Guide - - By: Ted Smith, [3/5]. "To a certain extent, when you've played one, you've played them all..
|
- Electronic Playground - - By: Mark H. Walker, [8.5/10]. "Combines a top-notch economic/civic model, attractive graphics, and solid real-time combat to give gamers a slice of Chinese history." (April 26, 2001)
|
- Gamezilla - - By: Alex Karls, 'Not Recommended'. "Little more than a sophisticated Age of Empires clone with slightly better art." (April 23, 2001)
|
- GameZone.com - - By: Michael Lafferty, [8/10]. "As solid a game as there is on the market, and a nice introduction to players to have never ventured into this realm. It is a good program, and quite enjoyable." (April 5, 2001)
|
- GameSpot - - By: Elliott Chin, [7.4/10]. "Ultimately, unless the historical Chinese context interests you, you'll find that Fate of the Dragon is just another real-time strategy game with a few original features, but with nothing really outstanding to recommend it." (April 3, 2001)
|
- GameSpy.com - - By: Tim McConnaughy, [88/100]. "Fate of the Dragon raises the bar on the RTS genre while keeping things simple enough for new gamers." Also has screenshots. (April, 2001)
|
- IGN.com - - By: Dan Adams, [8/10]. "There isn't a lot of variety in the units (just slight adjustments depending on your warlord), the graphics aren't the best you'll ever see, and the sound is hit and miss, but if you are looking to try something with some cool new features, this may be for you." (March 30, 2001)
|
- GameOver - - By: Fwiffo, 77%. "If you can get past this threshold, there is a gem underneath, if only a little unpolished." (March 15, 2001)
|
|